A Note to Our Valued Customers
Like many small businesses, we've experienced the frustrating effects of Yelp's automated review filtering system. Despite our best efforts, we have found that many of our legitimate 5-star reviews are hidden from our main page, while nearly all critical reviews remain visible.
​
We have reported reviews that are clearly from competitors or individuals who have never been customers, but Yelp's process has not led to their removal.
We believe in transparency, so we wanted to make you aware of this. To get a more complete and accurate view of our reputation, we invite you to read our testimonials on other platforms like Google or our website.
We are incredibly grateful for our wonderful customers and the positive experiences we share.
​
Please Scroll Below For More Information
Here’s what you should know:
Many business owners and even a public documentary, Billion Dollar Bully, have raised serious concerns about Yelp's practices. The core issue is an alleged connection between advertising and how reviews are displayed.
The common allegations include:
​
-
Filtering of Positive Reviews: Yelp’s automated system frequently filters out and hides legitimate, positive reviews from real customers. You can often find these hidden reviews at the very bottom of the page in a section called "Reviews Not Currently Recommended."
​
-
Pressure to Advertise: There are widespread reports from business owners that they face aggressive sales pressure from Yelp. The implication is that purchasing advertising can influence which reviews are made most visible.
​
-
Lack of Recourse: When businesses try to report clearly fake or malicious reviews—even with proof the reviewer was never a customer—the process often leads to a dead end, as Yelp's system is largely automated and difficult to appeal.
​
The Flawed Defense: What About the Harvard Study?
Yelp often cites a 2011 Harvard study to claim its review filter is unbiased. However, this is a misrepresentation of the study's findings.
​
-
The study was narrowly focused on whether the filter targeted small businesses that solicit reviews from customers. It did not study the filter's accuracy in identifying fake reviews.
​
-
Crucially, the study itself stated that Yelp's filter has "false positives" — meaning it incorrectly flags and hides a significant number of legitimate, genuine reviews. This finding directly confirms the daily experience of countless businesses, including our own: real customer testimonials are being wrongly hidden.
The Legal Shield That Prevents Justice:
​
Perhaps the most frustrating part is the legal barrier. When businesses have sued Yelp for these practices, the courts have often been unable to rule on the merits of the case. This is because Yelp is protected by a federal law from 1996 called the Communications Decency Act (CDA), specifically Section 230.
​
-
What the Law Does: This law was created to protect websites from being sued for content their users post. For example, a newspaper can't sue Facebook for a defamatory comment a user leaves.
​
-
How Yelp Uses It: Yelp argues that all reviews, and even its algorithmic filtering of those reviews, are protected under this act. They claim that choosing which reviews to highlight or hide is simply them "curating" user content, which the CDA allows.
​
-
The Court's Dilemma: There have been instances where judges have expressed sympathy for small businesses, stating that their cases against Yelp have merit, but their hands are tied by this broad legal shield. Yelp, in effect, is immunized from liability for how it manages the reviews on its platform, even when business owners feel the system is being manipulated.
​
We want you to hear from all of our customers, not just a select few. For a more complete and unfiltered view of our reputation, we invite you to read our reviews on other platforms where this filtering does not occur.
​​​​​​
Thank you for your support and for taking the time to understand this issue. We value your trust above all else.
How Yelp Elite Reviewers Hold Too Much Power
​
The system described above creates a perfect environment for a specific problem: the disproportionate influence of Yelp Elite reviewers. This small, platform-verified group can wield outsized power over a business’s reputation, often with just a handful of reviews.
​​
​
A Data-Driven Case Study
​
To illustrate how this works in practice, we can examine a real-world example. Consider a well-established restaurant in a major city. Publicly available data from its Yelp page shows a telling pattern:
​
-
The restaurant has thousands of reviews, with a clear majority (over 1,500) being 4 or 5 stars.
-
Despite this volume of positive feedback, its overall Yelp rating remains significantly below 4 stars.
​
This discrepancy between the volume of praise and the final score points directly to systemic issues in how Yelp curates and weights reviews.
​
Elite Reviews Are Permanent and Prominent
​
Yelp’s review filter, which routinely hides positive feedback, has one glaring and consistent exception: reviews from Yelp Elite members. Data analysis suggests that whether positive or negative, Elite reviews are far less likely to be filtered. This policy effectively grants Elite reviewers a permanent, prominent voice, allowing them to set the narrative for a business.
​
The Numbers Reveal the Structural Bias
​
An analysis of the restaurant's review breakdown highlights this structural inequity:
​
-
A very small percentage of the total 1-star reviews (approximately 3% in this case study) were from Elite members.
-
However, 100% of those Elite 1-star reviews remained prominently displayed.
-
While the total number of hidden 1-star reviews is smaller than the number of hidden 5-star reviews, a notable portion of the 1-star reviews that are hidden come from non-Elite accounts. This creates a visible imbalance: negative reviews from Elites enjoy protected status, while some from regular users do not.
​
This pattern indicates a platform bias: Elite status appears to grant review immunity. ​​
​
​
A Rigged Appeals Process
​
Compounding this problem is the extreme difficulty of appealing or removing a negative review, even when it is demonstrably false, misleading, or violates Yelp's own content guidelines. The process is notoriously opaque, slow, and heavily automated, often culminating in automated denials that cite broad "Terms of Service" language. For a business, this means a single protected Elite review—which could be factually inaccurate or excessively punitive—can remain posted indefinitely, with virtually no recourse. This lack of a fair or responsive appeals channel effectively grants the reviewer final and unchangeable authority.
​
​
The Psychology of Unchecked Influence
​
This guaranteed protection can foster a sense of entitlement among some Elite reviewers. Knowing their reviews are virtually untouchable and will be prominently featured, they may feel empowered to make exaggerated claims, present subjective opinions as fact, or levy harsh criticisms without the same accountability as everyday users. This dynamic can incentivize performative negativity or allow personal grievances to carry the same weight as legitimate, documented complaints, further distorting the online narrative.
​​
​
The Heavy Anchor of a Protected 1-Star
​
The mathematics of star ratings are unforgiving. A single 1-star review exerts a powerful downward pull on an average, requiring multiple 5-star reviews to counterbalance its effect. When that 1-star review comes from a protected Elite account—guaranteed visibility and permanence—it acts as an unmovable anchor on the score. This makes it statistically difficult for a business to improve its rating organically, regardless of how many satisfied customers it has.
Conclusion: A System That Amplifies the Few
​
The case study suggests that a low Yelp score is not always an honest reflection of customer sentiment. It can be the engineered result of a platform that:
​
-
Systematically obscures positive voices through automated filtering.
-
Protects and amplifies Elite voices above all others.
-
Fosters a culture of unchecked critique by granting a privileged group immunity from filtering.
-
Empowers a tiny, platform-verified minority with a durable megaphone, allowing a few negative reviews to disproportionately define a business's online reputation.
​
When evaluating a business on Yelp, it is worth asking: "Whose voices is this platform choosing to amplify?" Often, the answer points not to the majority of customer experiences, but to the privileged status and protected opinions of a few.